Android Studio 1.1 Gradle 2.2.1 Gradle version 2.1 required current version is 2.2.1 -

-

i trying compile latest version of u2020-daggr2 in android stu![e imported gradle project. error complaining gradle! did edit gradle-wrapper.properties. rebuilding did not work. did see: gradle 2.1 required migrate gradle wrapper , sync project seems same issue on studio did not find:

settings -> gradle , click use default gradle wrapper (recommended).

i did not find in studio. first off there no menu says setting. there : file->other setting->default setting. nothing gradle vm parameters etc. nothing using default gradle wrapper. enter image description here need have local copy of gradle 2.1 work? enter image description here ![enter image description here][4] enter image description here

gradle wrapper.properties edited such: distributionurl=https://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.1-all.zip

error:(20) problem occurred evaluating root project 'u2020-dagger2'.

failed apply plugin [id 'com.android.application'] gradle version 2.1 required. current version 2.2.1. if using gradlewrapper, try editing distributionurl in /users/mac1/downloads/u2020-dagger2 /gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties gradle-2.1-all.zip

you have use gradle-plugin in build.gradle

classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:1.1.0'

android studio 1.1.0 requires:

  • gradle 2.2.1 (you can set value in gradle-wrapper.properties)

  • gradle plugin 1.0.0/1.1.0 (you can set value in build.gradle)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

java - Could not locate OpenAL library -

-
i writing game using slick2d library, uses lwjgl. lwjgl version 2.9.3. using netbeans 8. i tried adding sounds game, example music track on main menu. problem is, exception when run game, despite game still compiling , running except sound of course: sat mar 21 01:23:57 edt 2015 error:could not locate openal library. org.lwjgl.lwjglexception: not locate openal library. @ org.lwjgl.openal.al.create(al.java:156) @ org.lwjgl.openal.al.create(al.java:156) @ org.lwjgl.openal.al.create(al.java:102) @ org.lwjgl.openal.al.create(al.java:206) @ org.newdawn.slick.openal.soundstore$1.run(soundstore.java:295) @ java.security.accesscontroller.doprivileged(native method) @ org.newdawn.slick.openal.soundstore.init(soundstore.java:292) @ org.newdawn.slick.music.<init>(music.java:156) @ org.newdawn.slick.music.<init>(music.java:75) @ view.mainmenu.init(mainmenu.java:58) i didn't include rest of error states error happens in game code. the...
Read more

c++ - Delete matches in OpenCV (Keypoints and descriptors) -

-
i want check scene image against 2 train images. that, detect features , compute descriptors of both training images. before detecting, computing , matching scene image, delete matches of train1 , train2. because these matches won't facilitate matching of scene image train1 , train2. so, match train1 train2 , vector of matches trainidx , queryidx. how can delete these matches in keypoints-vector , descriptor matrix of train1 , train2? best regards, dwi i have done below: std::vector<cv::keypoint> keypoints[2]; cv::mat descriptor[2]; std::vector< cv::dmatch > matches; /* write code generate keypoints, descriptors , matches here... keypoint[0] -> train image 1 keypoints keypoint[1] -> train image 2 keypoints descriptor[0] -> train image 1 descriptors descriptor[1] -> train image 2 descriptors matches -> matched between train image 1 , 2 */ // logic keep unmatched keypoints , corresponding descriptor...
Read more

sorting - opencl Bitonic sort with 64 bits keys -

-
i used nvidia sdk bitonic sort , works great me. 32 bits (uint) need ulong keys. have typically 2^14 keys @ time , power of 2. searched on not find kernel designed ulong. i tried modified nvidia sdk bitonic sort using ulong keys not work. kernel not crash after de call clenqueuendrangekernel got error : cl_invalid_command_queue can tell me how modify bitonic sort or radixsort, or can sort ulong keys? i running nvidia quadro 4000 opencl 1.1 cuda 6.5.20 full_profile used original nvidia sdk bitonicsort.cl i used"ulong" keys , value input , ouput instead of "uint" thanks helping i made work-around suit need. used 30 bits of key , 18 high bits of value sorting. changed comparators (2 lines): '#define mask 0xffffc000 // suit need from this: if( (*keya > *keyb) == dir ) this: if(((*keya > *keyb)||((*keya == *keyb)&&((*vala & mask)> (*valb & mask)))) == dir ) it works fine. but, still, it's work-a...
Read more